翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Moncorneil-Grazan
・ Moncourt
・ Moncoutant
・ Moncove Lake State Park
・ Moncrabeau
・ Moncreiffe
・ Moncreiffe baronets
・ Moncreiffe Hill
・ Moncreiffe Island
・ Moncrief
・ Moncrieff
・ Moncrieff and Hood disappearance
・ Moncrieff J. Spear
・ Moncrieff v Jamieson
・ Moncrieff, Australian Capital Territory
Moncrieffe v. Holder
・ Moncrivello
・ Moncton
・ Moncton (disambiguation)
・ Moncton (provincial electoral district)
・ Moncton Aigles Bleues women's ice hockey
・ Moncton Aigles Bleus
・ Moncton Alpines
・ Moncton and Buctouche Railway
・ Moncton Centre (electoral district)
・ Moncton Christian Academy
・ Moncton City Council
・ Moncton Coliseum
・ Moncton East (1974-2014 electoral district)
・ Moncton East (electoral district)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Moncrieffe v. Holder : ウィキペディア英語版
Moncrieffe v. Holder

''Moncrieffe v. Holder'' , 569 U.S. ___ (2013), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled in a 7–2 decision that "social sharing of a small amount of marijuana" by a legal immigrant does not constitute aggravated felony and hence does not require mandatory deportation.
==Background==
Adrian Moncrieffe is a Jamaican national who has lived in the United States since he moved there in 1984 at the age of three. In 2008 he was stopped by police in Georgia for a traffic violation when they found 1.3 grams of marijuana in his car. Moncrieffe pleaded guilty to the charge of marijuana possession with intent to distribute and agreed to a deal with no jail time. Two years later, immigration officials discovered the arrest and decided to detain and finally deport him, as drug trafficking charge is treated as an aggravated felony under immigration policies. After Moncrieffe lost his challenge in an administrative case, he was deported back to Jamaica.
Georgia's marijuana law, like most other states define possession with intent to distribute marijuana for no remuneration and distributing a small amount of marijuana charge under the same statute, which made his case. Under federal marijuana law the prior charge is treated as a possession case if it involves a small amount of marijuana which cleared Moncrieffe from having committing an aggravated felony(i.e. drug trafficking) under immigration law.
The Fifth Circuit Court upheld the deportation order, ruling that as the prosecution was not required to prove the amount of marijuana involved, the conviction amounted to a felony under federal law. The Supreme Court granted writ of certiorari to clear up confusion in the lower courts. The federal government argued that as the distinction based on the amount of marijuana possessed was a sentencing and not a conviction issue, and, hence did not affect the deportation order.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Moncrieffe v. Holder」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.